3
VELASCO COUPLE SEND LAWYERS TO THE NBI
Former House speaker Lord Allan Velasco and his wife, Rowena, did not personally attend the NBI inquiry on October 5. Their lawyers went to the bureau in response to an invitation concerning cash-delivery allegations by dismissed police officer Rodulfo Gracioso Jr. Counsel Rowell Ilagan denied that the couple delivered or facilitated the delivery of money to the individuals named in those allegations.
Ilagan said the lawyers had formally received Gracioso’s affidavit and would answer the allegations after reviewing the documents. He also said Velasco knows Gracioso, while leaving the nature of that relationship for a later response. Gracioso has claimed that he delivered money to members of the Duterte family on Velasco’s instructions; the people accused have denied the claims.
Sending counsel shows that the invitation received a response. It does not settle whether Gracioso’s account is accurate, and the couple’s absence does not establish guilt. Investigators still need to test his account against records, dates and other people who can confirm or challenge what he says happened.
For taxpayers, the unanswered question is whether the alleged deliveries occurred and where any money came from. A sworn accusation provides an account that can be investigated. The public needs the supporting evidence and the accused parties’ specific answers before reaching a conclusion about responsibility.
WHAT TO WATCH
Watch for the Velascos’ formal response and the NBI’s account of the evidence it has checked. Payment records, messages or corroborating witnesses would give investigators something concrete to compare with Gracioso’s allegations and the lawyers’ denial.