MCT CASE TRACKERTracking Sara Duterte’s impeachmentHearings, documents and disputed issues.Follow the trial → MCT CASE TRACKERTracking Rodrigo Duterte’s ICC caseCourt records, hearing dates and sourced notes.Follow the case →

LATEST COMMENTARY

View all commentary →

FIVE THINGS TO KNOW

7:23 AM5-minute read

ABOUT LINO CAYETANO AND THE CHANGE AT THE PCO

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. announced on October 11 that Lino Cayetano would replace Dave Gomez at the Presidential Communications Office. He said Gomez had been bypassed by the Commission on Appointments and that the change would be formalized when they returned from Singapore.

Read the explainer →
6:10 PM4-minute read

ABOUT THE DISPUTE OVER CHANGING THE ORDER OF IMPEACHMENT WITNESSES

The argument at Thursday’s impeachment hearing was about which witness the prosecution could present next. It began with an absent lawyer and became a dispute over preparation and notice. Understanding the exchange helps explain why a courtroom can pause even when the parties, documents and another potential witness are already in the building.

Read the explainer →
3:01 PM3-minute read

ABOUT MARK VILLAR’S MOVE TO THE SENATE MAJORITY

Senator Mark Villar has formally left the Senate minority and joined the majority. The October 8 move strengthens the bloc supporting the chamber’s leadership and gives Villar two significant positions. Its implications for Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial, however, require more than counting political allies.

Read the explainer →
9:56 AM4-minute read

ABOUT THE MANAGER’S CHECKS AND THE QUESTIONS OVER SARA DUTERTE’S SALN

A bank balance can fall even when the value represented by the money has not disappeared. That distinction sits behind the prosecution’s questions about manager’s checks in Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial. To understand the October 7 testimony, we need to follow the instrument, the person entitled to its value and the declaration of assets for the relevant year.

Read the explainer →
9:08 PM3-minute read

ABOUT WHAT COA’S REJECTION OF THE OVP APPEAL MEANS

COA has rejected the request to reconsider the ₱73.287-million disallowance involving the Office of the Vice President’s December 2022 confidential expenses. The October 5 resolution became public on October 7. Its significance is easier to understand when the amount, the audit finding and the available legal remedies are kept separate.

Read the explainer →
7:47 AM3-minute read

ABOUT WHAT BANK SECRECY PROTECTS IN AN IMPEACHMENT TRIAL

The arguments over bank records in Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial involve several protections. The privacy of a peso deposit, the protection of a foreign-currency deposit, and the confidentiality of a report sent to the AMLC come from different rules. Understanding those differences helps explain what the court has allowed and what remains in dispute.

Read the explainer →
8:43 AM8-minute read

ABOUT THE AMLC RECORDS IN SARA DUTERTE’S IMPEACHMENT TRIAL

₱4.4 billion is a figure that can dominate a conversation before anyone asks what it counts. AMLC Executive Director Ronel Buenaventura presented that approximate total in the Senate impeachment court on October 5, covering reported transactions involving Vice President Sara Duterte and her husband, Manases Carpio. He also explained that a bank correction had reduced the earlier figure of ₱6.7 billion.

Read the explainer →
6:44 PM5-minute read

ABOUT THE COINS.PH CASH-IN RESTRICTION AND WHAT USERS SHOULD CHECK

If you use Coins.ph to receive money or pay bills, a failed cash-in can disrupt plans for the day. Coins.ph has announced that some incoming peso services are temporarily unavailable following a BSP directive to improve its internal controls. Its advisory also identifies services that existing customers can still use.

Read the explainer →
12:00 PM5-minute read

ABOUT THE PROPOSED RULES ON SECONDHAND PHONES

A secondhand phone can put a useful device within reach of someone who cannot afford a new one. The problem comes when the buyer has no clear information about where it came from, what condition it is in, or who will fix it if it fails.

Read the explainer →
8:35 PM6-minute read

ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION ON THE IMPEACHMENT VOTE THRESHOLD

The Supreme Court dismissed three petitions on September 30 challenging how the Senate impeachment court would count the votes needed to convict Vice President Sara Duterte. The dismissal leaves the Senate’s September 23 ruling in place, but it needs to be read carefully. A case can be dismissed because it does not meet the requirements for the Court to hear it, without settling whether the challenged action is constitutional.

Read the explainer →
6:12 AM6-minute read

ABOUT WHAT BASTE DUTERTE SHOULD HAVE CHECKED AS MAYOR

Davao City Mayor Sebastian “Baste” Duterte told the Senate impeachment court on September 29 that he had been unfamiliar with GenCorp Industries Inc. before it came up in the proceedings. He also said he did not know about Vice President Sara Duterte’s declared business interest in the company.

Read the explainer →
10:45 PM7-minute read

ABOUT THE OCTOBER WATER-RATE INCREASES

Metro Manila households served by Maynilad and Manila Water will see slightly higher water charges beginning October 1. The announced increases are small for many residential customers, but the figures vary by concessionaire and consumption level. That makes it easy to misunderstand a notice expressed only in centavos per cubic meter.

Read the explainer →
7:21 AM6-minute read

ABOUT THE NOTE HANDED TO GIBO TEODORO IN SEOUL

Defense Secretary Gilberto “Gibo” Teodoro Jr. was answering questions at the Seoul Defense Dialogue on September 8 when a man handed him a note. He read it aloud, challenged its rejection of the 2016 South China Sea ruling and objected to being interrupted that way.

Read the explainer →
9:55 AM8-minute read

ABOUT EL NIÑO AND PREPARING FOR LESS RAIN

It can be raining outside while PAGASA warns about El Niño. That can sound confusing when the immediate problem is a wet road or a flooded field. The two warnings describe different periods: the weather happening now and the rainfall conditions that may develop over the coming months.

Read the explainer →
5:30 AM8-minute read

ABOUT THE NEW ARREST WARRANTS AGAINST ZALDY CO, MARTIN ROMUALDEZ AND TWO OTHERS

The Sandiganbayan has ordered the arrest of Zaldy Co, Martin Romualdez and two other accused in the plunder case filed on September 7. By Monday evening, authorities had served Romualdez's warrant and carried out booking procedures at Cardinal Santos Medical Center in San Juan. His arrest is a confirmed development; it does not establish that his three co-accused are also in custody.

Read the explainer →
3:15 PM8-minute read

ABOUT THE PLUNDER CASE AGAINST MARTIN ROMUALDEZ

The Office of the Ombudsman filed a plunder case against former House Speaker Martin Romualdez at the Sandiganbayan on September 7 over his alleged involvement in flood-control kickbacks. The accusations have now reached the court that will handle the criminal case. Romualdez denies wrongdoing and remains presumed innocent.

Read the explainer →
1:18 PM7-minute read

ABOUT THE NEW SWS POVERTY NUMBERS

Self-rated poverty and food poverty declined in June, but the figures also show how many Filipino families remain under pressure and why lower household budgets do not necessarily mean life became cheaper.

Read the explainer →
2:02 PM11-minute read

ABOUT THE CHILDREN'S SOCIAL MEDIA SAFETY ACT

House Bill No. 9965 would bar children below 13 from having social media accounts, require parental consent for users aged 13 to 17, regulate platform algorithms, and impose fines reaching P50 million. It is still being deliberated in the House.

Read the explainer →
12:02 PM7-minute read

ABOUT THE SEALED BIR BOX

Marcos authorized the BIR to comply with the Senate subpoena. That did not open the records to the public or prove the unexplained-wealth allegation.

Read the explainer →

MCT READER PULSE · MCT-PULSE-2026-014

MCT READER SURVEY

Sang-ayon ka ba sa desisyon ng prosekusyon na i-withdraw ang tatlo sa apat na impeachment article laban kay Sara Duterte at ituloy lamang ang Article II?

Answer the survey →

This is an informal survey of people who choose to participate. It is not a scientific or nationally representative sample.

View previous survey results →
October 18, 2026 · Afternoon7-minute read

ABOUT DECLARING AN AMBASSADOR PERSONA NON GRATA

Several lawmakers want Chinese Ambassador Jing Quan sent home. The Chinese Embassy has challenged them to follow through. That exchange leaves an ordinary reader with a reasonable question: if our own officials say an ambassador should leave, why is he still here?

Actual official portrait of Jing Quan beside a cream-fade MCT title panel, with a red PERSONA NON-GRATA? question stamp below his face.
File portrait of Ambassador Jing Quan from the Chinese Embassy in Manila. Cropped and overlaid with MCT branding and an editorial question stamp; the stamp is not an official declaration. Official portrait and biography

Jing said China could easily win if it used force against the Philippines. He also said China would not choose force and wanted peace. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. said the remark sounded like a threat. Calls to declare the ambassador persona non grata have followed, while Marcos has sought a face-to-face meeting.

Before judging whether the government is acting or merely talking, it helps to know what that declaration can do, who can make it take effect, and which consequences would need separate decisions.

1

THE PHILIPPINES CAN WITHDRAW ITS ACCEPTANCE OF A DIPLOMAT

Persona non grata means a person is no longer welcome. For diplomats, Article 9 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations lets the receiving country notify the sending country that it no longer accepts a named diplomat. It can do this without explaining its decision. [Vienna Convention, Articles 9 and 39](https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/9_1_1961.pdf)

The sending country must then recall the person or end that person's work with the mission. The receiving country can refuse recognition if the other government fails to act within a reasonable period.

This gives the Philippines a way to stop accepting a particular foreign representative without first winning a criminal case against him. Readers should therefore ask whether Manila has sent that formal notice. A lawmaker's demand for action and the government's notice to Beijing are different events.

WHAT TO WATCH

An announcement from Malacañang or the DFA confirming formal notice, identifying the diplomat concerned, and explaining the arrangements that follow.

2

A SENATOR'S DEMAND DOES NOT SEND THE AMBASSADOR HOME

The Supreme Court's Saguisag decision describes the President's leading role in conducting foreign relations. The executive deals with the other government through the country's diplomatic channels. Congress has its own constitutional powers, but a speech or a resolution urging the ambassador's removal does not itself complete that diplomatic step. [Saguisag decision](https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2016/jan2016/gr_212426_2016.html)

Lawmakers can put pressure on the President and make their position public. We should still read what a resolution actually asks for: condemnation, an explanation, a recommendation to expel, or something else. Those are different demands, even when headlines use the same phrase.

For a reader trying to judge a senator's promise, the useful questions are whether the senator has filed anything, what it says, and what the executive does with it. Loud criticism alone cannot confirm that the ambassador's posting has ended. [Current dispute and full remark](https://www.onenews.ph/articles/china-embassy-dares-congress-just-do-it-stop-bluffing-on-persona-non-grata)

WHAT TO WATCH

The text and status of any congressional resolution, followed separately by the President's and DFA's response. Do not report a proposed or adopted recommendation as an expulsion already carried out.

3

SENDING ONE AMBASSADOR HOME DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY CUT DIPLOMATIC TIES

Removing a diplomat and ending relations between two countries are separate choices. A government can object to the person representing another country while continuing to deal with that country. In March 2026, for example, Lebanon's foreign ministry said its order for Iran's ambassador to leave did not mean it was cutting diplomatic relations with Tehran. [Lebanon ministry account](https://www.arabnews.com/middle-east/lebanon-says-expulsion-of-ambassador-is-not-a-break-in-ties-with-tehran-2637458)

The UN's explanation of diplomatic relations also describes the work that missions do: communicate with the host government, negotiate, report developments, and help protect their country's interests and citizens. Those jobs help explain why the decision about one envoy should not be confused with a decision about the whole relationship. [UN explanation of diplomatic relations](https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/vcdr/vcdr.html)

For Filipinos with work, family, or business abroad, practical questions concern which services remain open and what official notices say. We should not tell them that flights, visas, trade, or jobs automatically stop because an ambassador is declared unwelcome. Each claimed consequence needs its own evidence.

WHAT TO WATCH

Separate announcements about embassy operations, a replacement or acting head of mission, consular services, or any actual restriction. A prediction about broken ties is not proof that ties have been broken.

4

THE DECLARATION DOES NOT ERASE DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY ON THE SPOT

Article 39 says diplomatic privileges and immunities normally continue until the diplomat leaves or a reasonable period for departure expires. Immunity for official acts can continue afterward. A declaration alone is therefore no permission to seize, attack, or immediately arrest the diplomat. [Vienna Convention, Articles 9 and 39](https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/9_1_1961.pdf)

The UN explains these protections as a way for missions to work without being coerced through local law enforcement. They do not make a diplomat's comments correct or put them beyond public criticism. Citizens can reject an envoy's words and demand lawful action while expecting their government to follow the rules protecting diplomatic personnel. [UN explanation of diplomatic relations](https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/vcdr/vcdr.html)

This also gives readers a way to check viral claims. A post saying an ambassador is now automatically open to arrest should identify the legal basis and the actual government action, rather than stopping at a persona non grata headline.

WHAT TO WATCH

The departure arrangements, any official account of the diplomat's status, and the legal basis for any proposed enforcement action. A social media claim that immunity has vanished is not enough.

5

THE GOVERNMENT STILL HAS TO EXPLAIN WHAT IT WANTS TO ACHIEVE

Sending an ambassador home could express a firm rejection of his conduct. It could also bring a response affecting Philippine diplomats abroad. Reciprocal expulsions have happened elsewhere: in February 2014, the United States announced the removal of Venezuelan diplomats in response to Venezuela's removal of American officials. [US State Department, February 25, 2014](https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2014/02/222442.htm)

That example does not predict Beijing's response today. It shows why the government should explain both its aim and its preparations. Is it seeking an apology, a replacement envoy, a clearer commitment against threats, or a change in conduct at sea? Different goals call for different follow-through.

For Filipino fishermen, the result must eventually be checked against their safety and access to fishing grounds. For the wider public, it should be possible to ask whether an announced diplomatic move achieved anything beyond another angry exchange. Choosing dialogue also leaves officials responsible for explaining what that dialogue accomplished.

WHAT TO WATCH

The government's stated goal, Beijing's actual response, and any documented change in the conduct being challenged. Judge both action and restraint against the results officials said they were seeking.

BOTTOM LINE

The Philippines has a lawful way to reject a foreign diplomat. Whether it uses that power in this dispute is a decision the executive must own and explain. Lawmakers demanding action should be precise about the step they want, and the public should be able to follow what happens after the demand. An ambassador's departure would be one result; safer conditions for Filipinos would need their own proof.

GOOGLE PREFERRED SOURCES

FOLLOW MCT ON GOOGLE

Google’s Preferred Sources feature lets you choose publications you want Google to prioritize for you. Select “Add to Preferred Sources” to make MCT easier to find in Top Stories and other eligible Google results. This does not subscribe you to email.

← Back to MCT home

SUPPORT MCT

HELP KEEP INDEPENDENT POLITICAL WRITING GOING.

Morning Coffee Thoughts is reader-supported. Contributions help pay for research tools, hosting, and the work required to verify and explain each development.

Monthly PayPal subscription — choose your support amount.Subscribe monthly through PayPal

PayPal automatically charges your chosen amount every month until you cancel the subscription in PayPal.

Send support through GCash or Maya0969 314 4839