MCT CASE TRACKERTracking Sara Duterte’s impeachmentHearings, documents and disputed issues.Follow the trial → MCT CASE TRACKERTracking Rodrigo Duterte’s ICC caseCourt records, hearing dates and sourced notes.Follow the case →

LATEST COMMENTARY

View all commentary →

FIVE THINGS TO KNOW

7:23 AM5-minute read

ABOUT LINO CAYETANO AND THE CHANGE AT THE PCO

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. announced on October 11 that Lino Cayetano would replace Dave Gomez at the Presidential Communications Office. He said Gomez had been bypassed by the Commission on Appointments and that the change would be formalized when they returned from Singapore.

Read the explainer →
6:10 PM4-minute read

ABOUT THE DISPUTE OVER CHANGING THE ORDER OF IMPEACHMENT WITNESSES

The argument at Thursday’s impeachment hearing was about which witness the prosecution could present next. It began with an absent lawyer and became a dispute over preparation and notice. Understanding the exchange helps explain why a courtroom can pause even when the parties, documents and another potential witness are already in the building.

Read the explainer →
3:01 PM3-minute read

ABOUT MARK VILLAR’S MOVE TO THE SENATE MAJORITY

Senator Mark Villar has formally left the Senate minority and joined the majority. The October 8 move strengthens the bloc supporting the chamber’s leadership and gives Villar two significant positions. Its implications for Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial, however, require more than counting political allies.

Read the explainer →
9:56 AM4-minute read

ABOUT THE MANAGER’S CHECKS AND THE QUESTIONS OVER SARA DUTERTE’S SALN

A bank balance can fall even when the value represented by the money has not disappeared. That distinction sits behind the prosecution’s questions about manager’s checks in Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial. To understand the October 7 testimony, we need to follow the instrument, the person entitled to its value and the declaration of assets for the relevant year.

Read the explainer →
9:08 PM3-minute read

ABOUT WHAT COA’S REJECTION OF THE OVP APPEAL MEANS

COA has rejected the request to reconsider the ₱73.287-million disallowance involving the Office of the Vice President’s December 2022 confidential expenses. The October 5 resolution became public on October 7. Its significance is easier to understand when the amount, the audit finding and the available legal remedies are kept separate.

Read the explainer →
7:47 AM3-minute read

ABOUT WHAT BANK SECRECY PROTECTS IN AN IMPEACHMENT TRIAL

The arguments over bank records in Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial involve several protections. The privacy of a peso deposit, the protection of a foreign-currency deposit, and the confidentiality of a report sent to the AMLC come from different rules. Understanding those differences helps explain what the court has allowed and what remains in dispute.

Read the explainer →
8:43 AM8-minute read

ABOUT THE AMLC RECORDS IN SARA DUTERTE’S IMPEACHMENT TRIAL

₱4.4 billion is a figure that can dominate a conversation before anyone asks what it counts. AMLC Executive Director Ronel Buenaventura presented that approximate total in the Senate impeachment court on October 5, covering reported transactions involving Vice President Sara Duterte and her husband, Manases Carpio. He also explained that a bank correction had reduced the earlier figure of ₱6.7 billion.

Read the explainer →
6:44 PM5-minute read

ABOUT THE COINS.PH CASH-IN RESTRICTION AND WHAT USERS SHOULD CHECK

If you use Coins.ph to receive money or pay bills, a failed cash-in can disrupt plans for the day. Coins.ph has announced that some incoming peso services are temporarily unavailable following a BSP directive to improve its internal controls. Its advisory also identifies services that existing customers can still use.

Read the explainer →
12:00 PM5-minute read

ABOUT THE PROPOSED RULES ON SECONDHAND PHONES

A secondhand phone can put a useful device within reach of someone who cannot afford a new one. The problem comes when the buyer has no clear information about where it came from, what condition it is in, or who will fix it if it fails.

Read the explainer →
8:35 PM6-minute read

ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION ON THE IMPEACHMENT VOTE THRESHOLD

The Supreme Court dismissed three petitions on September 30 challenging how the Senate impeachment court would count the votes needed to convict Vice President Sara Duterte. The dismissal leaves the Senate’s September 23 ruling in place, but it needs to be read carefully. A case can be dismissed because it does not meet the requirements for the Court to hear it, without settling whether the challenged action is constitutional.

Read the explainer →
6:12 AM6-minute read

ABOUT WHAT BASTE DUTERTE SHOULD HAVE CHECKED AS MAYOR

Davao City Mayor Sebastian “Baste” Duterte told the Senate impeachment court on September 29 that he had been unfamiliar with GenCorp Industries Inc. before it came up in the proceedings. He also said he did not know about Vice President Sara Duterte’s declared business interest in the company.

Read the explainer →
10:45 PM7-minute read

ABOUT THE OCTOBER WATER-RATE INCREASES

Metro Manila households served by Maynilad and Manila Water will see slightly higher water charges beginning October 1. The announced increases are small for many residential customers, but the figures vary by concessionaire and consumption level. That makes it easy to misunderstand a notice expressed only in centavos per cubic meter.

Read the explainer →
7:21 AM6-minute read

ABOUT THE NOTE HANDED TO GIBO TEODORO IN SEOUL

Defense Secretary Gilberto “Gibo” Teodoro Jr. was answering questions at the Seoul Defense Dialogue on September 8 when a man handed him a note. He read it aloud, challenged its rejection of the 2016 South China Sea ruling and objected to being interrupted that way.

Read the explainer →
9:55 AM8-minute read

ABOUT EL NIÑO AND PREPARING FOR LESS RAIN

It can be raining outside while PAGASA warns about El Niño. That can sound confusing when the immediate problem is a wet road or a flooded field. The two warnings describe different periods: the weather happening now and the rainfall conditions that may develop over the coming months.

Read the explainer →
5:30 AM8-minute read

ABOUT THE NEW ARREST WARRANTS AGAINST ZALDY CO, MARTIN ROMUALDEZ AND TWO OTHERS

The Sandiganbayan has ordered the arrest of Zaldy Co, Martin Romualdez and two other accused in the plunder case filed on September 7. By Monday evening, authorities had served Romualdez's warrant and carried out booking procedures at Cardinal Santos Medical Center in San Juan. His arrest is a confirmed development; it does not establish that his three co-accused are also in custody.

Read the explainer →
3:15 PM8-minute read

ABOUT THE PLUNDER CASE AGAINST MARTIN ROMUALDEZ

The Office of the Ombudsman filed a plunder case against former House Speaker Martin Romualdez at the Sandiganbayan on September 7 over his alleged involvement in flood-control kickbacks. The accusations have now reached the court that will handle the criminal case. Romualdez denies wrongdoing and remains presumed innocent.

Read the explainer →
1:18 PM7-minute read

ABOUT THE NEW SWS POVERTY NUMBERS

Self-rated poverty and food poverty declined in June, but the figures also show how many Filipino families remain under pressure and why lower household budgets do not necessarily mean life became cheaper.

Read the explainer →
2:02 PM11-minute read

ABOUT THE CHILDREN'S SOCIAL MEDIA SAFETY ACT

House Bill No. 9965 would bar children below 13 from having social media accounts, require parental consent for users aged 13 to 17, regulate platform algorithms, and impose fines reaching P50 million. It is still being deliberated in the House.

Read the explainer →
12:02 PM7-minute read

ABOUT THE SEALED BIR BOX

Marcos authorized the BIR to comply with the Senate subpoena. That did not open the records to the public or prove the unexplained-wealth allegation.

Read the explainer →

MCT READER PULSE · MCT-PULSE-2026-014

MCT READER SURVEY

Sang-ayon ka ba sa desisyon ng prosekusyon na i-withdraw ang tatlo sa apat na impeachment article laban kay Sara Duterte at ituloy lamang ang Article II?

Answer the survey →

This is an informal survey of people who choose to participate. It is not a scientific or nationally representative sample.

View previous survey results →
October 17, 2026 · Morning6-minute read

ABOUT MISINFORMATION COMING FROM SENATORS THEMSELVES

We tell people to check before they share.

Real file photograph of the Philippine Senate session hall with MCT title and logo, photographed by Avito Dalan for PNA on May 29, 2025.
File photo: The Philippine Senate session hall in Pasay City, May 29, 2025. Photo by Avito Dalan / Philippine News Agency. Cropped and overlaid with MCT title and branding; not a photograph of the incidents discussed. Photograph and attribution · Public-domain source information

But what happens when the person spreading a misleading claim is a senator?

Someone with paid staff, access to government records, and a platform that can turn a questionable statement into a national talking point?

The recent argument over the cost of Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial brings that question into focus.

Here are five things worth understanding.

1

Imee Marcos’s ₱575-million claim needs more than multiplication

An October 16 report described a Facebook post by Senator Imee Marcos claiming that ₱575 million had been spent on the impeachment proceedings involving two withdrawn articles.

Her calculation used ₱25 million a day: ₱350 million for 14 days on Article I and ₱225 million for nine days on Article IV. She described the money as wasted. [Report on Marcos’s post](https://smninewschannel.com/%E2%82%B1575-m-gastos-sa-impeachment-trial-kinuwestiyon-ni-sen-imee-marcos/)

The arithmetic adds up. The question is whether the daily figure belongs in that calculation.

In an October 14 statement, Win Gatchalian said ₱25 million represented the cost of operating the entire Senate, including salaries, rent, maintenance, and utilities. Those expenses, he said, would exist with or without an impeachment trial.

He reported ₱14,553,561.70 in expenses directly tied to 44 trial days, averaging about ₱330,763 a day. [Gatchalian’s statement](https://wingatchalian.com/news/statement-on-the-cost-of-the-impeachment-trial/)

His statement is not an independent audit. But it exposes a serious problem with treating the whole Senate’s operating cost as money spent solely because of the trial.

WHAT TO WATCH

Before calling ₱575 million wasted, Marcos should show the spending records behind that claim.

2

Calling something wasteful is an opinion. Claiming a specific cost needs evidence.

A senator can believe the prosecution handled the case badly. A senator can argue that withdrawing articles wasted time.

Those are arguments the public can weigh.

But attaching a precise amount gives the argument the appearance of a documented financial finding.

Which expenses were counted? Were they additional expenses? Would salaries and rent have been paid anyway? What records connect the amount to those particular articles?

These questions do not excuse waste. They help establish whether the alleged waste happened.

A senator criticizing public spending should be willing to show the same supporting documents they would demand from an official appearing before a hearing.

WHAT TO WATCH

Otherwise, the public receives an accusation dressed up as accounting.

3

This year’s Charter-change video shows how an allegation can gain an official stage

On May 25, 2026, Imee Marcos presented a video during a Senate session alleging a Charter-change effort involving term extensions and cancellation of the 2028 elections.

Several colleagues challenged it. Kiko Pangilinan said the constitutional-amendments committee had held no Charter-change hearings during his chairmanship. Marcos later withdrew the video from the Senate record. [GMA’s account](https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/nation/989238/explainer-charter-change/story/), [Pangilinan’s delivered statement](https://kikopangilinan.com/sen-kikos-manifestation-seconding-the-motion-to-strike-off-the-record-the-priv-speech-of-sen-imee-marcos-as-delivered/)

We should be precise about what that establishes.

Her colleagues’ objections do not, by themselves, prove that no private conversation about Charter change ever happened. Withdrawing a video is not a court finding that every allegation in it was false.

But a senator presenting such a serious claim should supply evidence that the public can examine.

WHAT TO WATCH

Showing a video inside the Senate does not turn its allegations into established facts.

4

A misleading claim does not automatically prove a deliberate lie

We can challenge Marcos’s spending calculation without pretending to know what she was thinking.

We can ask what supported the Charter-change allegations without assuming every political warning is knowingly fabricated.

A false claim, an unsupported allegation, and a deliberate lie are different things.

That distinction should make our criticism stronger. We identify the statement, compare it with the available records, and explain the gap.

The same care applies to other senators. Disliking Robin Padilla, Bong Go, or anyone else does not make a fabricated quote card evidence against them.

WHAT TO WATCH

Before holding a senator responsible, establish that the statement actually came from that senator.

5

Senators should correct the public record, not leave citizens to clean it up

When an official’s claim falls apart, the response should be clear.

Identify what was wrong. Give the correct information. Show the source.

If a graphic used the wrong basis for its calculation, publish a corrected graphic. If an allegation was presented without enough evidence, acknowledge that gap.

A quiet deletion leaves people who already shared the post unaware of the problem.

And attacking critics does nothing to answer the original question.

The public can also watch what happens after an error is pointed out: does the senator explain, correct, or keep repeating it?

WHAT TO WATCH

That response tells us something about how seriously the office takes its responsibility to the people listening.

BOTTOM LINE

Some senators have challenged misleading claims from their colleagues. But a rebuttal should not be where accountability ends.

When a senator spreads a misleading figure or an unsupported allegation, what happens next? Is the public record clearly corrected? Does the senator explain the mistake? What does the Senate do to keep it from happening again?

The public deserves answers. Citizens should not be left to untangle claims that elected officials and their paid staff should have checked before releasing them.

Until those corrections come, we have to be more vigilant, including with senators we support.

Ask for the original document. Check what the numbers cover. Read beyond the graphic. When someone claims a court has ruled, look for the decision.

If you shared something wrong, correct it. If a senator’s office posted it, ask that office to explain and correct it publicly.

A senator’s title is no guarantee that a claim is true. Neither is our admiration for that senator.

We pay them to scrutinize evidence. We should not have to keep doing their homework for them.

GOOGLE PREFERRED SOURCES

FOLLOW MCT ON GOOGLE

Google’s Preferred Sources feature lets you choose publications you want Google to prioritize for you. Select “Add to Preferred Sources” to make MCT easier to find in Top Stories and other eligible Google results. This does not subscribe you to email.

← Back to MCT home

SUPPORT MCT

HELP KEEP INDEPENDENT POLITICAL WRITING GOING.

Morning Coffee Thoughts is reader-supported. Contributions help pay for research tools, hosting, and the work required to verify and explain each development.

Monthly PayPal subscription — choose your support amount.Subscribe monthly through PayPal

PayPal automatically charges your chosen amount every month until you cancel the subscription in PayPal.

Send support through GCash or Maya0969 314 4839