The Law That Helps Nobody But the Oil Companies: Why RA 8479 Must Go — and What Should Replace It
Republic Act 8479, the Downstream Oil Industry Deregulation Act of 1998, was supposed to bring fair fuel prices to Filipino consumers through market competition — but after 28 years, the oligopoly it promised to break is still standing, and the government has lost the legal authority to intervene when prices spiral. With the 2026 Middle East crisis pushing diesel toward P130 per liter and jeepney drivers spending up to 60 percent of their earnings on fuel, RA 8479 is no longer a debatable policy experiment — it is a documented failure. Two repeal bills are already on the floor of Congress, and the only question left is whether the Marcos administration has the will to replace RA 8479 with a framework that actually protects the people it was supposed to serve.
16 min read
The Philippines imports almost everything it burns. We produce a negligible amount of crude domestically — the Galoc oil field off Palawan, our only active producing field, was averaging roughly 1,000 to 1,300 barrels per day as of 2023, a number that keeps declining. Compare that to the roughly 170 million barrels of crude oil and petroleum products we import every year. We are a small country at the end of a very long supply chain, completely at the mercy of decisions made in Riyadh, Washington, and the Strait of Hormuz. That is a structural reality no president, no law, and no protest can change overnight.
But here is the part that should make you angry.
Knowing all of that — knowing we have zero leverage over global oil markets, knowing our peso takes a beating every time the dollar strengthens, knowing we import virtually everything we use — the country still passed a law in 1998 that also took away whatever domestic tools the government had left to protect us when things go wrong.
That law is Republic Act 8479, the Downstream Oil Industry Deregulation Act. After 28 years, it deserves retirement — but only together with a smarter replacement, not just louder outrage.
Where It Came From
Before RA 8479, the Philippines had the Oil Price Stabilization Fund — the OPSF — a government buffer created by Marcos Sr. in 1984 through Presidential Decree 1956. Oil companies were supposed to contribute to the fund when global prices dropped below the regulated price, and draw from it when prices spiked above the ceiling. The goal was simple: shield consumers from sudden price surges by letting the state absorb the worst of the shock.
On paper, that idea made sense. In practice, it turned into a political piggy bank.
Politicians kept delaying mandated price increases because higher pump prices are never popular. The deficit piled up. By 1990, Congress had to bail out the OPSF with a P5-billion emergency appropriation from the national budget. In 1992, Republic Act 7639 redirected P3 billion in OPSF funds to pay for National Power Corporation capital stock — money meant to buffer oil prices instead went to a different state enterprise. Chronic mismanagement, political abuse, and structural flaws eventually defined the fund.
When President Fidel Ramos came in with his "Philippines 2000" agenda pushing liberalization and deregulation across sectors, and when the IMF attached oil deregulation as a conditionality to a 1994 Extended Fund Facility loan, the OPSF's record made repeal an easy sell.
A first version of the deregulation law — RA 8180 — was struck down by the Supreme Court on December 3, 1997. The Court found three provisions that actually encouraged monopoly and restraint of trade, the opposite of what a deregulation measure was supposed to promote. Congress rewrote the law. RA 8479 was signed on February 10, 1998.
The goals placed on paper looked reasonable: stabilize prices through market competition, break the Big Three oligopoly of Petron, Shell, and Caltex, attract new investors into the oil sector, and remove distorting subsidies. Economic managers described their push for deregulation in a world of "stable" crude prices and a stronger peso, betting that more players would translate into lower prices for everyone.
Then the Asian financial crisis hit. The peso collapsed. Whatever "stable conditions" had been assumed vanished almost overnight.
What the Law Was Supposed to Do vs. What It Actually Did
The central promise of RA 8479 rested on a familiar line: let competition work, and prices will find a fair level. More players, more competition, lower margins, better deals for consumers.
That chain never fully formed in the Philippines.
The oligopoly didn't break at the infrastructure level. After deregulation, independent players did enter the retail market — Phoenix Petroleum and Seaoil among the notable ones — and by 2021, independents had grown to more than 60 percent of petroleum product volumes by market share. Pump-level competition improved: more brands, more stations, more options for motorists.
Infrastructure tells a different story. New entrants arrived as importers, not refiners. No new oil refinery has been built since deregulation. Caltex shut its Batangas refinery in September 2003. Shell permanently closed its Tabangao refinery in August 2020 and converted it into an import terminal. Petron's Bataan facility now operates as the country's only remaining refinery.
In other words, diversity exists at the forecourt, but control still sits with a small handful of firms that own refineries, import terminals, and bulk storage. Independent importers buy from the same global supply chain at roughly the same time and at broadly similar prices, so none of them can protect consumers when global crude spikes; they simply pass the shock on.
Prices do not move like prices in a healthy competitive market. When global crude prices rise, all major firms raise pump prices almost in lockstep. When global prices fall, rollbacks tend to come later and in smaller amounts, with some of the gap kept as extra margin. The Philippine Competition Commission's 2021 market study confirmed what consumers have felt for years: the largest firms retain structural advantages through logistics infrastructure and supply chains that smaller players cannot match. In a 2026 hearing, Rep. Miro Quimbo summed up the situation in one line: "No one is regulating their income because it's a free market."
The long-term price record tells its own story. Based on figures compiled by transport group PISTON from historical price data:
Diesel in March 1998: P8.10 per liter. By January 2025: P57.81. That amounts to a 714 percent increase.
Gasoline in March 1998: P11.62 per liter. By January 2025: P65.41. That amounts to a 563 percent increase.
Then came March 2026. Conflict widening in the Middle East sent global crude into a fresh surge, and a fully deregulated Philippine downstream sector passed on the shock without any meaningful buffer. A single-week price adjustment reached up to P38.50 per liter in combined hikes, with projections that diesel could breach P130 per liter if trends held. PISTON reported jeepney drivers spending up to 60 percent of daily earnings on fuel.
The Real Problem: We Took Away Our Own Tools
Any honest conversation begins with this: global oil prices set the tone for what Filipinos pay at the pump. That is a structural fact for an import-dependent country. When the Strait of Hormuz closes, when war breaks out in a producing region, when OPEC cuts output, waves will hit local prices no matter what Malacañang prefers.
Yet vulnerability and helplessness are not the same condition.
RA 8479 moved the country closer to helplessness by design. The law removed the Department of Energy's power to intervene in local pricing. It also outlawed "unfair" or "unreasonable" prices without defining those terms in operational, measurable ways. In effect, no clear threshold exists to trigger a government response. When the DOE attempted to force companies to disclose full cost breakdowns — crude, refining, logistics, and margins — the move stalled after legal challenges and resistance from industry. When the Russia-Ukraine war jolted global prices in 2022, government response fell back on targeted subsidies and appeals for voluntary restraint.
Current DOE Secretary Sharon Garin has acknowledged the limits in blunt terms. In a March 2026 interview, she explained that the department is "constrained by the law and the deregulation — we do not have the powers to cap or to control the prices." In one sentence, the country's lead energy regulator admitted that the legal framework took away key tools for crisis response.
Every oil-importing country lives with global price swings. Not every oil-importing country chooses to face those swings with almost no domestic policy instruments left on the table. The Philippines made that choice in 1998 and kept doubling down on it.
Why Nobody Has Fixed It in 28 Years
If RA 8479 has such a poor record, why has it stayed untouched for nearly three decades? Three forces keep it in place.
First: the state now leans heavily on fuel-related tax revenue. In 2025 discussions, Customs and Finance officials warned that suspending fuel excise taxes and VAT could cost the government somewhere between P136 billion and P330 billion in a single year, depending on scope and timing. That money pays for a long list of programs. Any administration that seriously entertains reform must answer a follow-up question: what replaces that revenue stream? So far, no one has wanted to walk into that fight.
Second: oil companies sit close to the political center of gravity. Petron belongs to the San Miguel group, one of the country's largest and most politically connected conglomerates. Other major players also sit inside business empires with deep links into politics and media. These are actors that can hire the best lawyers, shape public narratives, and wait out any administration that moves too slowly. Previous attempts to amend RA 8479 or restore limited regulation either died quietly in committee or moved in one chamber and stalled in the other.
Third: the "investment climate" card appears whenever reform momentum builds. PIDS, the state think tank, has repeatedly warned that revisiting deregulation could send the wrong signal to foreign investors, who might read it as a sign that the Philippines changes rules mid-game. In principle, that concern has weight: investors do care about regulatory predictability. In practice, the same argument now functions as a veto. Every effort to design stronger consumer protection mechanisms in the energy sector runs into warnings about "spooking investors," and the conversation shuts down.
A small open economy with negligible crude production needs foreign capital and stable rules. It also needs a functioning framework for a commodity that underpins food prices, transport costs, and basic mobility. Pretending those needs are mutually exclusive solves nothing.
The Case for Repeal — With Eyes Open
Calls to repeal RA 8479 have been around for years. Some come from groups opposed to deregulation on principle, others from consumers pushed beyond their breaking point by each new wave of price hikes.
Straight repeal, on its own, does not solve much.
The OPSF era offers a clear warning. A stabilization fund managed inside the usual political cycle — with no independent oversight, no hard rules for activation, and no protection from diversion — ultimately sank under its own contradictions. That experience explains why technocrats flinch whenever "bring back the OPSF" appears on the table. Their hesitation stands on solid ground.
The better path is to treat the OPSF as a set of lessons rather than a model to resurrect. A modern replacement framework needs three core pillars.
A New Law With Teeth
The next law governing the downstream oil industry should focus on targeted powers rather than blanket control.
1. Emergency price ceilings with clear triggers. The DOE should have the legal authority to declare an energy price emergency and impose temporary retail price caps when specific conditions are met: for example, when global crude prices breach a certain level for a defined number of days, or when cumulative pump price increases cross a percentage threshold within a given period. Those conditions should be written into the statute itself, leaving less room for political whim and making both government and industry aware of the rules long before any crisis hits.
2. Statutory price unbundling. Every company selling petroleum products in the Philippines should be required by law to publish, on a regular schedule, the itemized components of its prices: crude acquisition cost, refining or import cost, transport and logistics, dealer margin, and corporate margin. Consumers, journalists, and regulators would gain a basic x-ray of how much they pay for each layer. Cost components that suddenly diverge from trends would be far easier to spot and challenge.
3. Quantified anti-profiteering standards. Vague bans on "unreasonable" or "unjust" pricing invite non-enforcement. A modern law should define a reasonable band for margins based on transparent cost references. Margins that shoot significantly beyond that band over a defined period would automatically trigger review and potential penalties. The aim is not blanket price control, but a system that sets red lines for profiteering when markets are tight.
Reform Isn't Theoretical Anymore: HB 8766 and SB 1984
The ideas above are already finding their way into draft legislation.
On March 25, 2026, ACT Teachers Rep. Antonio Tinio, Gabriela Women's Party Rep. Sarah Jane Elago, and Kabataan Rep. Renee Louise Co filed House Bill 8766, titled "An Act Regulating the Downstream Petroleum Industry, Repealing Republic Act No. 8479…" The bill:
Repeals RA 8479;
Creates a Petroleum Price Regulatory Council with authority to approve or deny proposed price adjustments after public hearings; and
Requires price unbundling and detailed inventory and cost reporting, giving the council power to stop hikes that cannot be justified by disclosed costs.
Alongside it, the same bloc filed HB 8765 to amend the Price Act so fuel explicitly counts as a prime commodity, making it possible to impose price ceilings during emergencies even while RA 8479 technically still stands.
In the Senate, the move no longer comes only from the left. Senate President Vicente Sotto III filed SB 1984, also seeking repeal of the oil deregulation law. When Makabayan and the Senate President — two actors who rarely share policy space — both push toward repeal, that convergence reveals how weak the status quo has become.
These bills still need committee hearings, amendments, and votes. But at minimum they show that an alternative architecture is no longer just a thought experiment.
An Independent Petroleum Regulatory Commission
Any replacement regime that relies only on the DOE's existing structure risks another cycle of over-promising and under-enforcing. Cabinet agencies, by design, operate under political pressure. They respond to the sitting president, the budget process, and shifting coalitions in Congress.
A more credible design would place core oversight responsibilities in an independent Petroleum Regulatory Commission. The body could be modeled structurally on the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) but with a narrower, more focused mandate.
Key design points:
Commissioners serve fixed terms and can be removed only for clear, legally defined cause.
An independent panel screens nominees based on technical competence and track record.
A fixed percentage of fuel excise revenue flows automatically to the commission's budget, reducing the risk of funding cuts being used as leverage.
Methodologies for computing allowable price adjustments and margins are published, accessible, and open to scrutiny.
Decisions are appealable to the courts, not to the executive branch.
Structured this way, a regulator gains enough distance from both politicians and industry to make hard calls when they matter most. HB 8766's proposed council already moves in this direction; the real fight, if it progresses, will revolve around how independent that body truly becomes once lawmakers finish editing the bill.
A Self-Financing Strategic Buffer Fund
Price regulation alone cannot carry the weight of shielding consumers from global shocks. A strategic buffer adds another layer of protection.
A Strategic Petroleum Buffer Fund could draw from a fixed slice of fuel excise taxes and activate only when certain legal triggers are met. Once triggered, the fund would pay for temporary per-liter discounts or targeted subsidies at the retail level, with both the amount and duration set by statute. The law could cap maximum annual exposure to protect fiscal stability.
Two safeguards matter most:
Constitutional or quasi-constitutional protection against diversion to non-energy uses, so OPSF-style raids for unrelated projects become far more difficult.
Full transparency: regular publication of fund balances, inflows, and outflows, so the public can see exactly how much is being collected and how it is being used.
Models exist. Malaysia's pricing mechanisms and Thailand's Oil Fund offer regional examples of how governments can smooth shocks without locking in permanent subsidies. The point is not to copy them wholesale, but to stop pretending the Philippines needs to reinvent the concept from scratch.
Why Marcos Has a Once-in-a-Generation Opening
The 2026 Middle East crisis achieved in weeks what two decades of technical papers and sectoral statements could not: it placed fuel price pain at the center of public attention. The shock has touched jeepney drivers and private motorists, grocery prices and delivery riders, small businesses and salaried employees. Everyone now feels, in daily life, what "deregulation" looks like in a fully import-dependent country.
President Marcos Jr. has publicly said that repealing the oil deregulation law is "not off the table." On March 24, 2026, he signed Executive Order 110 declaring a state of national energy emergency and directing the DOE to safeguard supply and address price issues. The executive branch now openly acknowledges that the current situation requires extraordinary measures.
Yet the same statement that opens the door to reform also reveals hesitation. The President has emphasized the need for long discussions and careful study, while DOE officials repeatedly point to legal constraints under RA 8479. The underlying choice remains unresolved: does this administration intend to rebuild a regulatory framework that can manage crises, or will it settle for temporary subsidies while the structure stays intact?
There is also a historical echo that cannot be ignored. Marcos Sr. created the OPSF in 1984. Ramos, under IMF pressure and liberalization fervor, took the country down the path to deregulation that killed it. Marcos Jr. now stands in a position to close that loop, not by returning to his father's model, but by building something his father's era never had: a transparent, rules-based, independently overseen system for managing a strategic commodity.
Few presidents get that kind of opportunity.
The Honest Bottom Line
Global oil markets will never sit under Philippine control. That fact will not change no matter how many bills Congress passes or how many speeches Malacañang delivers.
What can change is how nakedly those global swings cut into daily life.
RA 8479 took a country that already depended almost entirely on imported oil and removed most of the domestic instruments that could have softened inevitable blows. Retail-level competition did expand, particularly through independent importers, but the infrastructure that really shapes pricing — refineries, import terminals, bulk storage — stayed concentrated in the hands of a few firms. Consumers now live at the intersection of global volatility, peso weakness, and a domestic legal regime that tells regulators to mostly stand back.
A small, oil-importing country with negligible domestic production, a fragile currency, and deep poverty has no business living under a framework that strips its government of basic crisis-management tools for energy. That approach serves the balance sheets of firms that can pass on costs instantly and completely. It hardly serves the jeepney driver trying to stretch a day's earnings, the market vendor watching transport costs climb, or the commuter who has no alternative to higher fares.
Repealing RA 8479, on its own, will not magically lower prices or insulate the Philippines from the next war or embargo. Repeal paired with a hard-headed replacement — independent regulation, transparent cost breakdowns, clear anti-profiteering rules, and a properly designed buffer fund — gives the country a fighting chance to stop making a bad situation worse.
The ideas exist. Draft laws now exist. The question left on the table is the same one that hangs over every crisis in this country: whether those in power will use the tools in front of them, or once again choose to ride out the storm and leave the structure untouched.
SOURCES:
PISTON — 27 Years of Oil Deregulation: Bleeding Drivers Dry
https://pistonph.com/27-years-of-oil-deregulation-bleeding-drivers-dry-while-oil-cartels-rake-in-profits-piston/Supreme Court E-Library — Declaring Full Deregulation of the Downstream Oil Industry (EO 392)
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/10/46933Inquirer Opinion — Time to Amend Oil Deregulation Law
https://opinion.inquirer.net/157513/time-to-amend-oil-deregulation-lawGMA Network — Marcos on Repealing Oil Deregulation Law: Nothing's Being Discounted
https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/money/economy/981602/marcos-on-repealing-oil-deregulation-law-nothing-s-being-discounted/story/LawPhil — Republic Act No. 8479 Full Text
https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1998/ra_8479_1998.htmlWTO Import Licensing — Republic Act No. 8479 Downstream Oil Industry
https://importlicensing.wto.org/sites/default/files/members/117/Republic%20Act%20No.8479%20-%20Downstream%20oil%20industry_10.02.pdfInquirer News — Makabayan Says Fuel Cost Spike Shows Failure of Oil Deregulation Law
https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2193671/told-you-so-makabayan-says-fuel-cost-spike-shows-deregulations-failureGMA Network — What Is the Oil Deregulation Law?
https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/money/economy/980552/understanding-the-oil-deregulation-law-and-its-impact-on-fuel-prices/story/Inquirer News — Sotto Bill Seeks Repeal of Oil Deregulation Law
https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2197523/sotto-wants-oil-deregulation-act-repealedInquirer News — Marcos: Repeal of Oil Deregulation Law Not Off Table
https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2202265/marcos-on-oil-deregulation-lawPIDS — Oil Deregulation (PDF)
https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidseid0002-feb.PDFPhilippine Competition Commission — Market Study on the Refined Petroleum Industry (PDF)
https://www.phcc.gov.ph/storage/pdf-resources/1678085292_PCC-Issues-Paper-2021-05-Market-Study-on-the-Refined-Petroleum-Industry.pdfPhilstar — RP Oil Industry Remains an Oligopoly — Concepcion
https://www.philstar.com/business/2005/03/15/270427/rp-oil-industry-remains-an-oligopoly-151-concepcionInquirer Opinion — Deregulation Then and Now
https://opinion.inquirer.net/165209/deregulation-then-and-nowManila Bulletin — OPSF Not Solution to Stabilize Oil Prices — PIDS
https://mb.com.ph/2022/06/09/opsf-not-solution-to-stabilize-oil-prices-pids/Philstar — Oil Price Stabilization Fund Revival Will Work Against the Poor
https://www.philstar.com/business/2022/06/09/2187244/oil-price-stabilization-fund-revival-will-work-against-poor-state-think-tankPNA — Proposed Changes to Oil Deregulation Law to Benefit Filipinos
https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1169910PIDS — Reviving the Oil Price Stabilization Fund: Risks and Alternatives (PDF)
https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/document/OPSF-Risks-Alternatives-webinar-v2.pdfPhilstar — Lessons from the Oil Deregulation Law
https://www.philstar.com/business/2023/02/28/2248054/lessons-oil-deregulation-lawBusiness World — Oil Deregulation Law Comes in for Scrutiny After Fuel Prices Spike
https://www.bworldonline.com/economy/2026/03/10/735397/oil-deregulation-law-comes-in-for-scrutiny-after-fuel-prices-spike-due-to-middle-east-conflict/Philstar — Oil Deregulation Law Complicates Response to Fuel Price Spikes
https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2026/03/10/2513336/oil-deregulation-law-complicates-response-to-fuel-price-spikes-solonsInquirer Business — Jumbo Oil Price Hike Seen at Up to P22.30/Liter on March 17
https://business.inquirer.net/579209/jumbo-oil-price-hike-seen-at-up-to-p22-30-liter-on-march-17GMA Network — Marcos Brushes Aside Discussion on Government Takeover of PH Oil Industry
https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/nation/981350/marcos-ph-oil-industry-takeover-discussion/story/Manila Bulletin — Oil Deregulation Repeal, VAT Removal Under Study but Focus Is on Other Priorities — Marcos
https://mb.com.ph/2026/03/27/oil-deregulation-repeal-vat-removal-under-study-but-not-prioritymarcosPhilstar — Staggered Fuel Price Hikes Start Next Week
https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2026/03/06/2512414/staggered-fuel-price-hikes-start-next-weekManila Bulletin — Ultra Oil Price Hike Coming: Diesel Up P19.62, Gasoline Up P10.43
https://mb.com.ph/2026/03/07/ultra-fuel-price-hike-coming-diesel-up-1962-gasoline-up-1043Astute Analytica — Philippines Petroleum Market Analysis
https://www.astuteanalytica.com/industry-report/philippines-petroleum-marketPIDS — On the OPSF and the Downstream Oil Industry Deregulation (PDF)
https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/document/pidsdps2216.pdfSupreme Court E-Library — Declaring Full Deregulation (EO 392 underlying documents)
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/10/39898Economists Urge Government to Revisit Oil Deregulation Law — CDO Bombo Radyo
https://cdo.bomboradyo.com/economists-urge-government-to-revisit-oil-deregulation-law/PNA — Lawmaker Pushes for Revival of Oil Price Stabilization Fund
https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1178660PIDS — Revival of Oil Price Stabilization Fund Anti-Poor (PDF)
https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/document/1655082219_62a68ceb82dba.pdfJur.ph — Unconstitutionality of Oil Deregulation Law RA 8180
https://jur.ph/law/summary/unconstitutionality-of-oil-deregulation-law-ra-8180LawPhil — G.R. No. 124360 (RA 8180 Supreme Court Decision)
https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri1997/dec1997/gr_124360_1997.htmlSupreme Court E-Library — Garcia vs. Executive Secretary (RA 8180 case)
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/1/37051Supreme Court E-Library — Unconstitutionality of RA 8180
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/11/45451Supreme Court E-Library — Republic Act No. 7639 (NPC Capital Stock from OPSF)
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/2086Supreme Court E-Library — Petroleum Price Standby Fund Act
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocs/2/2462LawPhil — Executive Order No. 137 (1986, OPSF provisions)
https://lawphil.net/executive/execord/eo1986/eo_137_1986.htmlInquirer News — Bongbong Marcos Urged to Revive Dad's Oil Price Stabilization Fund
https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1625574/bongbong-marcos-urged-to-revive-dads-oil-price-stabilization-fundIMF Independent Evaluation Office — Philippines (Structural Conditionalities PDF)
https://ieo.imf.org/-/media/ieo/files/evaluations/completed/09-25-2002-evaluation-of-prolonged-use-of-imf-resources/092502chap10.pdfLawPhil — Executive Order No. 471 (Full Deregulation under RA 8479)
https://lawphil.net/executive/execord/eo1998/eo_471_1998.htmlPhilstar — Caltex Closes Refinery
https://www.philstar.com/business/2003/09/24/221794/caltex-closes-refineryInquirer Business — Shell Permanently Shuts Down Batangas Refinery
https://business.inquirer.net/305173/shell-permanently-shutting-down-batangas-refineryOil and Gas Journal — Pilipinas Shell Closing Tabangao Refinery
https://www.ogj.com/refining-processing/refining/operations/article/14181729/pilipinas-shell-closing-tabangao-refinery-converting-site-into-import-terminalInspectioneering — Shell to Permanently Shut Refinery in the Philippines
https://inspectioneering.com/news/2020-08-12/9324/shell-to-permanently-shut-refinery-in-the-philippinesTank Terminals — Pilipinas Shell to Convert Tabangao Oil Refinery Into Import Terminal
https://tankterminals.com/news/pilipinas-shell-to-convert-tabangao-oil-refinery-into-import-terminal/Petron — Who We Are
https://www.petron.com/who-we-are/Petron — Our History
https://www.petron.com/who-we-are/our-history/PISTON — Big-Time Oil Price Hikes: Regressive Fuel Taxes, Corruption Exacerbate Cost of Living Crisis
https://pistonph.com/piston-on-big-time-oil-price-hikes-regressive-fuel-taxes-and-corruption-exacerbate-cost-of-living-crisis-in-the-philippines/Filipino Historian Blog — Oil Deregulation in the Philippines
https://history-ph.blogspot.com/2017/06/oil-deregulation-in-philippines-final.htmlMobility Plaza — Phoenix Petroleum, a Bright Spot for Independent Oil Players
https://www.mobilityplaza.org/news/7454Phoenix Fuels — Phoenix Leads as Independents Continue Market Share Expansion
https://www.phoenixfuels.ph/phoenix-leads-as-independents-continue-market-share-expansion-in-1h21/Manila Bulletin — Phoenix Petroleum Widens Market Share
https://mb.com.ph/2021/9/24/phoenix-petroleum-widens-market-shareABS-CBN — Suspension of Fuel Excise Taxes, VAT Could Cost Government P330 Billion
https://www.abs-cbn.com/news/business/2026/3/10/suspension-of-fuel-excise-taxes-vat-could-cost-govt-p330-billion-customs-1454Inquirer News — PH May Lose P136-B in 2026 If Excise Tax Suspended Starting May
https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2192719/ph-may-lose-p136-b-in-2026-if-excise-tax-suspended-starting-mayPNA — Diokno: Suspending VAT, Excise Tax on Petroleum to Hurt Economy
https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1210136Oriental Petroleum and Minerals Corp — 2023 Annual Report (PDF)
https://opmc.com.ph/wp-content/uploads/2023-Annual-Report-Complete_compressed-1.pdfPhilstar — PXP Energy Continues Galoc Field Operations
https://www.philstar.com/business/2026/01/07/2499184/pxp-energy-continues-galoc-field-operationsManila Bulletin — Makabayan Pushes for Oil Deregulation Law Repeal, Billionaire Wealth Tax
https://mb.com.ph/2026/03/27/makabayan-pushes-for-oil-deregulation-law-repeal-billionaire-wealth-taxManila Bulletin — Makabayan Bats for Crucial Amendment to Price Act as Fuel Costs Soar
https://mb.com.ph/2026/03/25/makabayan-bats-for-crucial-ammendment-to-price-act-as-fuel-costs-soarInquirer News — House Makabayan Bloc Wants Special Session to Address Oil Crisis
https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2199779/emergency-session-needed-to-address-oil-crisisABS-CBN — Oil Shock Won't Lead to Power Outages, Energy Officials Tell Senate
https://www.abs-cbn.com/news/business/2026/3/24/oil-shock-won-t-lead-to-power-outages-energy-officials-tell-senate-1749
Contact us
subscribe to morning coffee thoughts today!
inquiry@morningcoffeethoughts.org
© 2024. All rights reserved.
If Morning Coffee Thoughts adds value to your day, you can support it with a monthly subscription.
You can also send your donation via Gcash: 0969 314 4839.