MCT CASE TRACKERTracking Sara Duterte’s impeachmentHearings, documents and disputed issues.Follow the trial → MCT CASE TRACKERTracking Rodrigo Duterte’s ICC caseCourt records, hearing dates and sourced notes.Follow the case →

LATEST COMMENTARY

View all commentary →

FIVE THINGS TO KNOW

7:23 AM5-minute read

ABOUT LINO CAYETANO AND THE CHANGE AT THE PCO

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. announced on October 11 that Lino Cayetano would replace Dave Gomez at the Presidential Communications Office. He said Gomez had been bypassed by the Commission on Appointments and that the change would be formalized when they returned from Singapore.

Read the explainer →
6:10 PM4-minute read

ABOUT THE DISPUTE OVER CHANGING THE ORDER OF IMPEACHMENT WITNESSES

The argument at Thursday’s impeachment hearing was about which witness the prosecution could present next. It began with an absent lawyer and became a dispute over preparation and notice. Understanding the exchange helps explain why a courtroom can pause even when the parties, documents and another potential witness are already in the building.

Read the explainer →
3:01 PM3-minute read

ABOUT MARK VILLAR’S MOVE TO THE SENATE MAJORITY

Senator Mark Villar has formally left the Senate minority and joined the majority. The October 8 move strengthens the bloc supporting the chamber’s leadership and gives Villar two significant positions. Its implications for Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial, however, require more than counting political allies.

Read the explainer →
9:56 AM4-minute read

ABOUT THE MANAGER’S CHECKS AND THE QUESTIONS OVER SARA DUTERTE’S SALN

A bank balance can fall even when the value represented by the money has not disappeared. That distinction sits behind the prosecution’s questions about manager’s checks in Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial. To understand the October 7 testimony, we need to follow the instrument, the person entitled to its value and the declaration of assets for the relevant year.

Read the explainer →
9:08 PM3-minute read

ABOUT WHAT COA’S REJECTION OF THE OVP APPEAL MEANS

COA has rejected the request to reconsider the ₱73.287-million disallowance involving the Office of the Vice President’s December 2022 confidential expenses. The October 5 resolution became public on October 7. Its significance is easier to understand when the amount, the audit finding and the available legal remedies are kept separate.

Read the explainer →
7:47 AM3-minute read

ABOUT WHAT BANK SECRECY PROTECTS IN AN IMPEACHMENT TRIAL

The arguments over bank records in Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial involve several protections. The privacy of a peso deposit, the protection of a foreign-currency deposit, and the confidentiality of a report sent to the AMLC come from different rules. Understanding those differences helps explain what the court has allowed and what remains in dispute.

Read the explainer →
8:43 AM8-minute read

ABOUT THE AMLC RECORDS IN SARA DUTERTE’S IMPEACHMENT TRIAL

₱4.4 billion is a figure that can dominate a conversation before anyone asks what it counts. AMLC Executive Director Ronel Buenaventura presented that approximate total in the Senate impeachment court on October 5, covering reported transactions involving Vice President Sara Duterte and her husband, Manases Carpio. He also explained that a bank correction had reduced the earlier figure of ₱6.7 billion.

Read the explainer →
6:44 PM5-minute read

ABOUT THE COINS.PH CASH-IN RESTRICTION AND WHAT USERS SHOULD CHECK

If you use Coins.ph to receive money or pay bills, a failed cash-in can disrupt plans for the day. Coins.ph has announced that some incoming peso services are temporarily unavailable following a BSP directive to improve its internal controls. Its advisory also identifies services that existing customers can still use.

Read the explainer →
12:00 PM5-minute read

ABOUT THE PROPOSED RULES ON SECONDHAND PHONES

A secondhand phone can put a useful device within reach of someone who cannot afford a new one. The problem comes when the buyer has no clear information about where it came from, what condition it is in, or who will fix it if it fails.

Read the explainer →
8:35 PM6-minute read

ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION ON THE IMPEACHMENT VOTE THRESHOLD

The Supreme Court dismissed three petitions on September 30 challenging how the Senate impeachment court would count the votes needed to convict Vice President Sara Duterte. The dismissal leaves the Senate’s September 23 ruling in place, but it needs to be read carefully. A case can be dismissed because it does not meet the requirements for the Court to hear it, without settling whether the challenged action is constitutional.

Read the explainer →
6:12 AM6-minute read

ABOUT WHAT BASTE DUTERTE SHOULD HAVE CHECKED AS MAYOR

Davao City Mayor Sebastian “Baste” Duterte told the Senate impeachment court on September 29 that he had been unfamiliar with GenCorp Industries Inc. before it came up in the proceedings. He also said he did not know about Vice President Sara Duterte’s declared business interest in the company.

Read the explainer →
10:45 PM7-minute read

ABOUT THE OCTOBER WATER-RATE INCREASES

Metro Manila households served by Maynilad and Manila Water will see slightly higher water charges beginning October 1. The announced increases are small for many residential customers, but the figures vary by concessionaire and consumption level. That makes it easy to misunderstand a notice expressed only in centavos per cubic meter.

Read the explainer →
7:21 AM6-minute read

ABOUT THE NOTE HANDED TO GIBO TEODORO IN SEOUL

Defense Secretary Gilberto “Gibo” Teodoro Jr. was answering questions at the Seoul Defense Dialogue on September 8 when a man handed him a note. He read it aloud, challenged its rejection of the 2016 South China Sea ruling and objected to being interrupted that way.

Read the explainer →
9:55 AM8-minute read

ABOUT EL NIÑO AND PREPARING FOR LESS RAIN

It can be raining outside while PAGASA warns about El Niño. That can sound confusing when the immediate problem is a wet road or a flooded field. The two warnings describe different periods: the weather happening now and the rainfall conditions that may develop over the coming months.

Read the explainer →
5:30 AM8-minute read

ABOUT THE NEW ARREST WARRANTS AGAINST ZALDY CO, MARTIN ROMUALDEZ AND TWO OTHERS

The Sandiganbayan has ordered the arrest of Zaldy Co, Martin Romualdez and two other accused in the plunder case filed on September 7. By Monday evening, authorities had served Romualdez's warrant and carried out booking procedures at Cardinal Santos Medical Center in San Juan. His arrest is a confirmed development; it does not establish that his three co-accused are also in custody.

Read the explainer →
3:15 PM8-minute read

ABOUT THE PLUNDER CASE AGAINST MARTIN ROMUALDEZ

The Office of the Ombudsman filed a plunder case against former House Speaker Martin Romualdez at the Sandiganbayan on September 7 over his alleged involvement in flood-control kickbacks. The accusations have now reached the court that will handle the criminal case. Romualdez denies wrongdoing and remains presumed innocent.

Read the explainer →
1:18 PM7-minute read

ABOUT THE NEW SWS POVERTY NUMBERS

Self-rated poverty and food poverty declined in June, but the figures also show how many Filipino families remain under pressure and why lower household budgets do not necessarily mean life became cheaper.

Read the explainer →
2:02 PM11-minute read

ABOUT THE CHILDREN'S SOCIAL MEDIA SAFETY ACT

House Bill No. 9965 would bar children below 13 from having social media accounts, require parental consent for users aged 13 to 17, regulate platform algorithms, and impose fines reaching P50 million. It is still being deliberated in the House.

Read the explainer →
12:02 PM7-minute read

ABOUT THE SEALED BIR BOX

Marcos authorized the BIR to comply with the Senate subpoena. That did not open the records to the public or prove the unexplained-wealth allegation.

Read the explainer →

MCT READER PULSE · MCT-PULSE-2026-014

MCT READER SURVEY

Sang-ayon ka ba sa desisyon ng prosekusyon na i-withdraw ang tatlo sa apat na impeachment article laban kay Sara Duterte at ituloy lamang ang Article II?

Answer the survey →

This is an informal survey of people who choose to participate. It is not a scientific or nationally representative sample.

View previous survey results →
September 30, 2026 · 8:35 PM6-minute read

ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION ON THE IMPEACHMENT VOTE THRESHOLD

The Supreme Court dismissed three petitions on September 30 challenging how the Senate impeachment court would count the votes needed to convict Vice President Sara Duterte. The dismissal leaves the Senate’s September 23 ruling in place, but it needs to be read carefully. A case can be dismissed because it does not meet the requirements for the Court to hear it, without settling whether the challenged action is constitutional.

The Philippine Supreme Court building in Manila. File photograph by Mike Gonzalez, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0.

Here are five things to know about what happened and how it affects the trial.

1

The Court dismissed the petitions on procedural grounds

The petitions were filed separately by Victor Rodriguez, Berteni Cataluña Causing, and Ernesto Francisco Jr. According to the Supreme Court’s announcement, the grounds for dismissal included lack of standing and prematurity.

In plain language, standing concerns whether the person bringing the case has a sufficient legal interest to ask the Court to act. Prematurity concerns whether the dispute has reached the stage where the Court can properly decide it. These requirements help determine whether a case can be heard before the Court addresses the constitutional arguments.

The announcement identifies those grounds without providing a detailed explanation of how each applied to every petition.

WHAT TO WATCH

The written resolutions and any further explanation of how the procedural grounds applied to each petition.

2

The argument is about which senators count toward the two-thirds requirement

The Constitution requires the concurrence of two-thirds of all members of the Senate to convict in an impeachment case. Using a membership of 24, that means 16 votes.

On September 23, the Senate impeachment court interpreted the membership used in that calculation to include only senators who are legally and actually able to participate when the vote takes place. That interpretation could produce a lower required number.

The petitioners challenged this reading. Their position was that senators remain members even when detained, temporarily absent, or medically unable to attend. They argued that those circumstances should not reduce the membership used to calculate the required votes.

WHAT TO WATCH

How the impeachment court determines which senators qualify for inclusion when judgment is taken, and the reasons it gives for any exclusion.

3

The Supreme Court did not set a fixed 14-vote threshold

Fourteen is one possible result of the Senate’s method of counting. It is not a number established by the Supreme Court’s September 30 announcement.

For example, two-thirds of 21 is 14. If 22 senators are counted, at least 15 votes would be needed because votes cannot be split into fractions. If all 24 are counted, the requirement remains 16.

These are examples of the arithmetic. They do not establish how many senators will ultimately be counted. The Senate’s stated rule concerns their ability to participate at the time of the vote. It should not be reduced to a claim that anyone who misses a hearing automatically disappears from the calculation.

WHAT TO WATCH

The actual membership count adopted for the final vote. Any report giving a required number should explain how that number was reached.

4

The Court’s announcement does not declare the Senate’s interpretation constitutional

The petitioners sought to have the September 23 ruling overturned and asked for orders that would stop its implementation or a final conviction vote while their challenges were pending. Their petitions were dismissed, leaving the Senate’s interpretation in place.

The Court’s announcement reports a procedural dismissal and does not announce a ruling on whether the Senate’s interpretation is constitutional. Describing the outcome as a Supreme Court declaration that the Senate’s interpretation is constitutional would go beyond what the announcement says.

The immediate effect is clear: these petitions did not overturn the Senate’s ruling. Whether the constitutional argument could be heard through a later legal challenge would depend on that case and whether it meets the Court’s requirements.

WHAT TO WATCH

Whether any further challenge is filed, what it asks the Court to decide, and whether the Court agrees to hear it.

5

The threshold can affect the outcome, but this decision does not decide Duterte’s guilt

The required number of votes determines whether a conviction carries. A change in that number can affect the result even when the votes cast by individual senators stay the same.

As a simple example, 15 votes for conviction would fall short of a 16-vote requirement. Those same 15 votes would meet a 15-vote requirement. This is why the disagreement over which senators count has drawn so much attention.

Still, the Supreme Court’s dismissal does not establish that the impeachment charges have been proven. It also does not tell us how any senator will vote on those charges. The senators’ eventual judgment remains a separate decision.

WHAT TO WATCH

Each senator’s vote and explanation when judgment comes, alongside the impeachment court’s official calculation of the votes required.

BOTTOM LINE

The Supreme Court dismissed the challenges to the Senate’s voting formula on September 30, leaving that formula in place. Its announcement cited procedural grounds, including lack of standing and prematurity.

For readers following the trial, the next questions are how many senators will be counted when judgment is taken, why they are included or excluded, and whether the votes for conviction reach the resulting threshold. The claim that the Supreme Court has already declared 14 votes sufficient goes beyond what it announced.

GOOGLE PREFERRED SOURCES

FOLLOW MCT ON GOOGLE

Google’s Preferred Sources feature lets you choose publications you want Google to prioritize for you. Select “Add to Preferred Sources” to make MCT easier to find in Top Stories and other eligible Google results. This does not subscribe you to email.

← Back to MCT home

SUPPORT MCT

HELP KEEP INDEPENDENT POLITICAL WRITING GOING.

Morning Coffee Thoughts is reader-supported. Contributions help pay for research tools, hosting, and the work required to verify and explain each development.

Monthly PayPal subscription — choose your support amount.Subscribe monthly through PayPal

PayPal automatically charges your chosen amount every month until you cancel the subscription in PayPal.

Send support through GCash or Maya0969 314 4839