MCT CASE TRACKERTracking Sara Duterte’s impeachmentHearings, documents and disputed issues.Follow the trial → MCT CASE TRACKERTracking Rodrigo Duterte’s ICC caseCourt records, hearing dates and sourced notes.Follow the case →

LATEST COMMENTARY

View all commentary →

FIVE THINGS TO KNOW

7:23 AM5-minute read

ABOUT LINO CAYETANO AND THE CHANGE AT THE PCO

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. announced on October 11 that Lino Cayetano would replace Dave Gomez at the Presidential Communications Office. He said Gomez had been bypassed by the Commission on Appointments and that the change would be formalized when they returned from Singapore.

Read the explainer →
6:10 PM4-minute read

ABOUT THE DISPUTE OVER CHANGING THE ORDER OF IMPEACHMENT WITNESSES

The argument at Thursday’s impeachment hearing was about which witness the prosecution could present next. It began with an absent lawyer and became a dispute over preparation and notice. Understanding the exchange helps explain why a courtroom can pause even when the parties, documents and another potential witness are already in the building.

Read the explainer →
3:01 PM3-minute read

ABOUT MARK VILLAR’S MOVE TO THE SENATE MAJORITY

Senator Mark Villar has formally left the Senate minority and joined the majority. The October 8 move strengthens the bloc supporting the chamber’s leadership and gives Villar two significant positions. Its implications for Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial, however, require more than counting political allies.

Read the explainer →
9:56 AM4-minute read

ABOUT THE MANAGER’S CHECKS AND THE QUESTIONS OVER SARA DUTERTE’S SALN

A bank balance can fall even when the value represented by the money has not disappeared. That distinction sits behind the prosecution’s questions about manager’s checks in Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial. To understand the October 7 testimony, we need to follow the instrument, the person entitled to its value and the declaration of assets for the relevant year.

Read the explainer →
9:08 PM3-minute read

ABOUT WHAT COA’S REJECTION OF THE OVP APPEAL MEANS

COA has rejected the request to reconsider the ₱73.287-million disallowance involving the Office of the Vice President’s December 2022 confidential expenses. The October 5 resolution became public on October 7. Its significance is easier to understand when the amount, the audit finding and the available legal remedies are kept separate.

Read the explainer →
7:47 AM3-minute read

ABOUT WHAT BANK SECRECY PROTECTS IN AN IMPEACHMENT TRIAL

The arguments over bank records in Sara Duterte’s impeachment trial involve several protections. The privacy of a peso deposit, the protection of a foreign-currency deposit, and the confidentiality of a report sent to the AMLC come from different rules. Understanding those differences helps explain what the court has allowed and what remains in dispute.

Read the explainer →
8:43 AM8-minute read

ABOUT THE AMLC RECORDS IN SARA DUTERTE’S IMPEACHMENT TRIAL

₱4.4 billion is a figure that can dominate a conversation before anyone asks what it counts. AMLC Executive Director Ronel Buenaventura presented that approximate total in the Senate impeachment court on October 5, covering reported transactions involving Vice President Sara Duterte and her husband, Manases Carpio. He also explained that a bank correction had reduced the earlier figure of ₱6.7 billion.

Read the explainer →
6:44 PM5-minute read

ABOUT THE COINS.PH CASH-IN RESTRICTION AND WHAT USERS SHOULD CHECK

If you use Coins.ph to receive money or pay bills, a failed cash-in can disrupt plans for the day. Coins.ph has announced that some incoming peso services are temporarily unavailable following a BSP directive to improve its internal controls. Its advisory also identifies services that existing customers can still use.

Read the explainer →
12:00 PM5-minute read

ABOUT THE PROPOSED RULES ON SECONDHAND PHONES

A secondhand phone can put a useful device within reach of someone who cannot afford a new one. The problem comes when the buyer has no clear information about where it came from, what condition it is in, or who will fix it if it fails.

Read the explainer →
8:35 PM6-minute read

ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION ON THE IMPEACHMENT VOTE THRESHOLD

The Supreme Court dismissed three petitions on September 30 challenging how the Senate impeachment court would count the votes needed to convict Vice President Sara Duterte. The dismissal leaves the Senate’s September 23 ruling in place, but it needs to be read carefully. A case can be dismissed because it does not meet the requirements for the Court to hear it, without settling whether the challenged action is constitutional.

Read the explainer →
6:12 AM6-minute read

ABOUT WHAT BASTE DUTERTE SHOULD HAVE CHECKED AS MAYOR

Davao City Mayor Sebastian “Baste” Duterte told the Senate impeachment court on September 29 that he had been unfamiliar with GenCorp Industries Inc. before it came up in the proceedings. He also said he did not know about Vice President Sara Duterte’s declared business interest in the company.

Read the explainer →
10:45 PM7-minute read

ABOUT THE OCTOBER WATER-RATE INCREASES

Metro Manila households served by Maynilad and Manila Water will see slightly higher water charges beginning October 1. The announced increases are small for many residential customers, but the figures vary by concessionaire and consumption level. That makes it easy to misunderstand a notice expressed only in centavos per cubic meter.

Read the explainer →
7:21 AM6-minute read

ABOUT THE NOTE HANDED TO GIBO TEODORO IN SEOUL

Defense Secretary Gilberto “Gibo” Teodoro Jr. was answering questions at the Seoul Defense Dialogue on September 8 when a man handed him a note. He read it aloud, challenged its rejection of the 2016 South China Sea ruling and objected to being interrupted that way.

Read the explainer →
9:55 AM8-minute read

ABOUT EL NIÑO AND PREPARING FOR LESS RAIN

It can be raining outside while PAGASA warns about El Niño. That can sound confusing when the immediate problem is a wet road or a flooded field. The two warnings describe different periods: the weather happening now and the rainfall conditions that may develop over the coming months.

Read the explainer →
5:30 AM8-minute read

ABOUT THE NEW ARREST WARRANTS AGAINST ZALDY CO, MARTIN ROMUALDEZ AND TWO OTHERS

The Sandiganbayan has ordered the arrest of Zaldy Co, Martin Romualdez and two other accused in the plunder case filed on September 7. By Monday evening, authorities had served Romualdez's warrant and carried out booking procedures at Cardinal Santos Medical Center in San Juan. His arrest is a confirmed development; it does not establish that his three co-accused are also in custody.

Read the explainer →
3:15 PM8-minute read

ABOUT THE PLUNDER CASE AGAINST MARTIN ROMUALDEZ

The Office of the Ombudsman filed a plunder case against former House Speaker Martin Romualdez at the Sandiganbayan on September 7 over his alleged involvement in flood-control kickbacks. The accusations have now reached the court that will handle the criminal case. Romualdez denies wrongdoing and remains presumed innocent.

Read the explainer →
1:18 PM7-minute read

ABOUT THE NEW SWS POVERTY NUMBERS

Self-rated poverty and food poverty declined in June, but the figures also show how many Filipino families remain under pressure and why lower household budgets do not necessarily mean life became cheaper.

Read the explainer →
2:02 PM11-minute read

ABOUT THE CHILDREN'S SOCIAL MEDIA SAFETY ACT

House Bill No. 9965 would bar children below 13 from having social media accounts, require parental consent for users aged 13 to 17, regulate platform algorithms, and impose fines reaching P50 million. It is still being deliberated in the House.

Read the explainer →
12:02 PM7-minute read

ABOUT THE SEALED BIR BOX

Marcos authorized the BIR to comply with the Senate subpoena. That did not open the records to the public or prove the unexplained-wealth allegation.

Read the explainer →

MCT READER PULSE · MCT-PULSE-2026-014

MCT READER SURVEY

Sang-ayon ka ba sa desisyon ng prosekusyon na i-withdraw ang tatlo sa apat na impeachment article laban kay Sara Duterte at ituloy lamang ang Article II?

Answer the survey →

This is an informal survey of people who choose to participate. It is not a scientific or nationally representative sample.

View previous survey results →
September 10, 2026 · 9:45 PM8-minute read

ABOUT THE MANHUNT FOR BATO DELA ROSA

Authorities say they know where he is. An arrest has yet to be confirmed.

Official portrait of Senator Ronald Bato dela Rosa from the Commission on Appointments.
Photo: Commission on Appointments

The government says it knows where Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa is hiding. It also says powerful people are protecting him. For anyone following the drug-war cases, that leaves a straightforward question: if officials know where he is, why is he still beyond their custody?

The latest statements do not provide a complete answer. Interior Secretary Jonvic Remulla has described negotiations, while the police say the search continues. Dela Rosa’s lawyer says he has no personal knowledge of the alleged protectors. No confirmed arrest date has been announced in the reports available as of September 10.

There is an existing International Criminal Court warrant behind this manhunt. The new development is what officials are saying about their efforts to carry it out, and the unanswered questions those statements raise.

1

Officials claim they know his location, but have not announced an arrest

In a September 8 interview on One News’ Storycon, Remulla said authorities knew Dela Rosa’s whereabouts and were negotiating with people protecting him. He described those people as powerful. The following day, Philippine National Police spokesman Colonel Allen Rae Co said police efforts to arrest the senator would continue despite the reported negotiations.

Those statements suggest officials are doing more than waiting for a tip. They do not establish that police have secured the location, reached an agreement or set a date to take him into custody. Remulla’s account of what the government knows remains his account; the public has not been given enough information to independently confirm it.

Police have reasons to keep operational details private. Publishing a location or an intended move could endanger officers and others. Even so, the government can be asked to account for the outcome. Saying that a wanted person has been located creates an expectation that authorities will explain, when it is safe to do so, what followed.

WHAT TO WATCH

A confirmed arrest or surrender, the agency taking custody and a clear official account of what happened. Another prediction that police will catch him soon would leave the central question unanswered.

2

The ICC warrant concerns alleged drug-war murders

The warrant was issued under seal on November 6, 2025, and made public on May 11, 2026. It concerns Dela Rosa’s alleged responsibility for the crime against humanity of murder, involving at least 32 people killed between July 3, 2016, and the end of April 2018.

The allegation goes beyond whether he personally fired a weapon. The court’s account concerns an alleged shared plan and his role in killings carried out through other people. That helps explain why a former police chief can face a case over operations performed by officers under a wider chain of command.

At this stage, ICC judges found reasonable grounds to believe he was responsible. A warrant is not a conviction. The prosecution still has to establish its case through the court’s proceedings, and Dela Rosa has the right to contest the allegations and evidence.

The families behind those alleged killings are easily lost in the daily discussion of his whereabouts. Bringing a suspect before a court would allow the case to move forward. It would not, by itself, settle what happened to each victim or deliver a final judgment.

WHAT TO WATCH

The court’s actual filings and orders. Any new allegation, change in the case or ruling on responsibility should be traced to those records, rather than inferred from an arrest announcement.

3

The alleged protectors have not been publicly identified

Dela Rosa’s lawyer, Israelito Torreon, said on September 9 that he had no personal knowledge of the powerful protectors Remulla described. His response leaves the government’s allegation disputed. It does not supply the names, roles or terms of any negotiations.

That gap is important because naming someone as a protector can amount to accusing that person of helping a wanted suspect evade authorities. Political friendships, photographs together or membership in the same party would not, on their own, prove that accusation. No one should be identified on that basis.

Remulla’s statement also raises a question about equal treatment. If influence is affecting how an arrest warrant is carried out, the public deserves an explanation supported by evidence. Officials need not disclose a dangerous operational detail to eventually explain whether assistance was offered, who dealt with whom and whether any arrangement affected enforcement.

For now, there is no verified basis here to claim a particular politician is sheltering Dela Rosa or that a secret deal has been completed. Who has helped him, and what any negotiations involve, still needs to be established.

WHAT TO WATCH

Evidence identifying any alleged assistance, an official explanation of the negotiations and a response from anyone subsequently named. A name circulating online is not sufficient confirmation.

4

Police are also accounting for firearms registered to him

Police reported that 26 of the 117 firearms registered to Dela Rosa had been surrendered, leaving 91 unaccounted for. The reported total consists of 20 turned over in Davao City and six in Calabarzon. These are the figures carried in the latest reporting; the surrender process began months earlier.

The firearms issue follows the revocation of his gun licences and registrations. In June, the PNP described the Davao turnover as part of implementing that revocation and placing the weapons in safekeeping. Returning registered weapons therefore has its own purpose even while the senator remains the subject of a manhunt.

The figure of 91 does not establish that all those guns are beside him, that his alleged protectors hold them or that any particular weapon was used in a crime. The available accounting does not answer those questions. It identifies weapons police still need to locate and account for.

That is a concrete public-safety concern: authorities should know where firearms subject to a revocation order have gone. The recovery total alone does not show whether anyone is preparing to resist arrest or whether a confrontation will occur.

WHAT TO WATCH

An updated inventory of recovered weapons, where the remaining firearms are found and whether police announce any separate case based on verified evidence.

5

An arrest would begin another stage, with further court decisions ahead

If Dela Rosa is arrested, the immediate questions would include who holds him, the legal basis cited and what authorities intend to do next. Taking him into Philippine custody and transferring him to the ICC are separate events. Being held in the Philippines would not mean he had already reached The Hague.

The Department of Justice said in May that law enforcement could serve the ICC warrant after the Supreme Court denied his request for a temporary restraining order. That May ruling dealt with the request for an immediate halt. It did not decide the merits of his main petition challenging the government’s cooperation with the ICC.

If he is surrendered to the ICC, an initial appearance would address the allegations and his rights. A later confirmation-of-charges hearing would examine whether there is enough evidence to send the case to trial. The defence can challenge the prosecution’s evidence at that stage. A trial and a verdict would involve further proceedings.

For families seeking accountability, each step would be significant. None makes the next outcome automatic. The case must still be tested in court, including the evidence linking Dela Rosa to the alleged crimes.

WHAT TO WATCH

Any new Philippine court order, an official custody announcement and, if a transfer occurs, confirmation from the ICC and its hearing schedule.

BOTTOM LINE

There is a real arrest warrant and an ongoing manhunt. The government’s claim that it knows Dela Rosa’s location has sharpened the question of why he remains outside custody. Claims about powerful protectors need evidence, and the police still have firearms to account for.

The next substantial development would be a verified arrest, surrender or court order that changes what authorities can do. Until then, there is no sound basis for promising when he will be caught. Accountability requires carrying out lawful court processes and proving allegations through evidence. It cannot be supplied by another confident prediction at a press briefing.

GOOGLE PREFERRED SOURCES

FOLLOW MCT ON GOOGLE

Google’s Preferred Sources feature lets you choose publications you want Google to prioritize for you. Select “Add to Preferred Sources” to make MCT easier to find in Top Stories and other eligible Google results. This does not subscribe you to email.

← Back to MCT home

SUPPORT MCT

HELP KEEP INDEPENDENT POLITICAL WRITING GOING.

Morning Coffee Thoughts is reader-supported. Contributions help pay for research tools, hosting, and the work required to verify and explain each development.

Monthly PayPal subscription — choose your support amount.Subscribe monthly through PayPal

PayPal automatically charges your chosen amount every month until you cancel the subscription in PayPal.

Send support through GCash or Maya0969 314 4839